10 Common Myths in Psychology — What People Think Is True (But Isn’t)
- 2 days ago
- 6 min read
Psychology is one of the most fascinating and widely applied sciences, yet it’s also a field rife with misconceptions. Many beliefs about the human mind and behaviour are persistent, intuitive, and often outdated. Let’s explore some of the most common myths in psychology and what research actually shows.

Myth 1: Milgram’s Obedience Experiments Proved Humans Will Blindly Harm Others When Ordered By Authority
One of the most famous studies in social psychology is Stanley Milgram’s obedience experiments from the 1960s, often described as showing that “65 % of people will shock a stranger to death if told to do so by an authority figure”. This dramatic interpretation has become a psychological cliché.
In reality, the findings are more nuanced. Milgram’s original research was designed to explore how far people would go when instructed by an experimenter they perceived as a legitimate authority, not to measure a fixed percentage of blind obedience. Moreover, later reinterpretations and re‑analyses have questioned the simplicity of the original claims.
Psychologists Alex Haslam and Steve Reicher argue that participants were not simply obeying authority but were influenced by the meaning they attributed to the situation — for example believing they were contributing to valuable scientific research.
Other critiques suggest that many participants did not believe the shocks were real or refused once they recognised the deception, undermining the idea of universal obedience.
So while Milgram’s work remains important for understanding social influence, it does not prove that people will always follow harmful orders without reflection.
Myth 2: We Only Use 10 % of Our Brain
This myth pops up everywhere — self‑help books, motivational speeches, popular articles — yet there’s no scientific support for it. Modern neuroscience shows that virtually all parts of the brain have identifiable functions and that even simple tasks activate multiple networks across the brain.
There is no evidence that 90 % of the brain is dormant or unused. Brain imaging, lesion studies, and neurological research demonstrate that the brain is active across its regions in both rest and task states. Psychology and neuroscience treat the “10 % rule” as an urban legend.
Myth 3: Memory Works Like a Video Recorder
A surprisingly common belief is that human memory captures events like a camera, storing them accurately and retrieving them as needed. Scientific research tells a very different story.
Memory is reconstructive, not reproductive. Experiments such as the Deese‑Roediger‑McDermott paradigm show that people can confidently “remember” words or events that never occurred just because they were semantically linked to real stimuli.
Similarly, the hindsight bias (also known as the “I‑knew‑it‑all‑along” effect) shows how people revise their memories to make outcomes seem more predictable after the fact.
These findings are why eyewitness testimony in legal settings can be unreliable and why memory can be influenced by suggestion, context, and emotion.
Myth 4: Left-Brained People Are Logical, Right-Brained People Are Creative
This notion has become entrenched in popular psychology, with many personality quizzes and self‑help books dividing people into “left‑brain” and “right‑brain” thinkers.
In truth, both hemispheres of the brain work together for almost all cognitive tasks. While certain functions (like language or spatial processing) may be laterally dominant in specific regions, the idea that one hemisphere makes someone predominantly analytical and the other creative is a simplification without empirical support.
Brain imaging studies confirm that creativity, logic, emotion, and problem‑solving all engage networks spanning both hemispheres.
Myth 5: Psychological Research Is Unreliable Because Many Findings Can’t Be Replicated
While it is true that some subfields of psychology — particularly social psychology — have faced a “replication crisis”, this doesn’t mean the discipline as a whole is invalid.
In fact, many findings have been successfully replicated and refined. The so‑called crisis has prompted more rigorous methods, open science practices, and larger sample sizes, strengthening the reliability of psychological research.
Moreover, the replication issue highlights how science evolves — not that it is inherently untrustworthy. This misunderstanding itself is a psychological myth underscored by misinterpretations of what replication means and how scientific knowledge progresses.
Myth 6: Cognitive Biases Can Be Eliminated Once We Know About Them
Most people assume that simply learning about cognitive biases — like the anchoring effect or loss aversion — means they can overcome them. But research shows that knowledge alone doesn’t eliminate biases.
For instance, the anchoring effect demonstrates that irrelevant numerical anchors influence decisions even when people are aware of the bias.
Similarly, educational interventions often fail to fully correct bias effects in real‑world decision‑making, because these mental shortcuts are automatic and deeply ingrained.
Understanding biases helps, but changing them often requires structured practice and environmental design, not just awareness.
Myth 7: High IQ Equals Successful Life Outcomes
It’s common to believe that intelligence, as measured by IQ tests, predicts career success, happiness, or life satisfaction.
In reality, IQ correlates modestly with academic performance but is only one piece of the puzzle. Emotional intelligence, motivation, social skills, perseverance, and environmental factors often play a larger role in life outcomes than IQ alone.
Myth 8: Psychological Disorders Are Caused Strictly by Chemical Imbalances
It is widely believed that depression, anxiety, or similar disorders are simply caused by a chemical imbalance in the brain (e.g., “low serotonin”).
Modern psychiatric and neuroscientific research describes mental health conditions as multifactorial — involving genetics, environment, stress, life events, psychological patterns, and yes, neurobiology. Chemical imbalance theory is oversimplified and not strongly supported by evidence.
Myth 9: People Have a Dominant Learning Style (Visual, Auditory, Kinesthetic)
Many people believe they are a “visual learner” or “auditory learner” and should therefore study according to that style.
Research does not support the effectiveness of learning‑styles instruction. People learn through multiple modalities and teaching according to “learning style” does not improve educational outcomes.
Myth 10: Addiction Is Simply a Lack of Willpower
Addiction — whether to substances, behaviours, or habits — is often described as a personal failure of self‑control.
Addiction is understood in modern psychology and neuroscience as a complex brain‑based disorder involving reward pathways, emotional regulation, genetic vulnerability, environmental triggers, and learning history. Lack of willpower is an oversimplified and stigma‑reinforcing explanation.
Why Psychological Myths Persist
These misconceptions survive because:
They are emotionally intuitive (“I want simple explanations”)
They are easy to communicate in media sound bites
People generalise individual experience to broad rules
Scientific findings get oversimplified or misquoted outside academic context
Understanding real psychological research requires nuance, context, and sometimes scepticism of appealing but unsupported claims.
The Importance of Critical Thinking
Psychology is a science — it evolves with evidence. Myths often persist not because they are meaningful, but because they feel right. When we unearth the complexity behind human behaviour, we not only get a more accurate picture of the mind, we also become better equipped to challenge our assumptions, improve self‑awareness, and make informed choices.
If you want to explore how real psychological principles apply to everyday life — from relationships to stress to decision‑making — grounded research and critical inquiry will always serve you better than catchy myths.
References
Thomas Blass. The Milgram Paradigm After 35 Years: Some Things We Now Know About Obedience to Authority1. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1999. Vol. 29(5):955-978. DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00134.x
Haslam SA, Reicher SD. When prisoners take over the prison: a social psychology of resistance. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2012 May;16(2):154-79. doi: 10.1177/1088868311419864. Epub 2011 Sep 1. PMID: 21885855.
Raichle, M. E. (2010, January). The brain’s dark energy. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-brains-dark-energy/
Association for Psychological Science. (n.d.). Myth: We only use 10 % of our brains. Psychological Science (APS). Retrieved [date you accessed it], from https://www.psychologicalscience.org/uncategorized/myth-we-only-use-10-of-our-brains.html
Pardilla-Delgado E, Payne JD. The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory. J Vis Exp. 2017 Jan 31;(119):54793. doi: 10.3791/54793. PMID: 28190038; PMCID: PMC5407674.
Gazzaniga, Michael. (2005). Gazzaniga, M.S. Forty-five years of split-brain research and still going strong. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 653-659. Nature reviews. Neuroscience. 6. 653-9. 10.1038/nrn1723.
Nielsen JA, Zielinski BA, Ferguson MA, Lainhart JE, Anderson JS. An evaluation of the left-brain vs. right-brain hypothesis with resting state functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging. PLoS One. 2013 Aug 14;8(8):e71275. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071275. PMID: 23967180; PMCID: PMC3743825.
Open Science Collaboration, Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.Science349,aac4716(2015).DOI:10.1126/science.aac4716
B.A. Nosek, C.R. Ebersole, A.C. DeHaven, & D.T. Mellor, The preregistration revolution,Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.115 (11) 2600-2606,https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114(2018).
Larrick, R.P. (2004). Debiasing. In Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making (eds D.J. Koehler and N. Harvey). https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470752937.ch16
Furnham, A., & Boo, H. C. (2011). A literature review of the anchoring effect. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2010.10.008
Mayer JD, Roberts RD, Barsade SG. Human abilities: emotional intelligence. Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:507-36. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093646. PMID: 17937602.
Heckman, J. J., & Kautz, T. (2012). Hard evidence on soft skills. Labour Economics, 19(4), 451–464. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0927537112000577?via%3Dihub
Nemeroff, C. B. (2007). Paradise lost: The neurobiological and clinical consequences of losing the serotonin hypothesis of depression. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 41(11), 1019–1025. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022395607001070?via%3Dihub
Moncrieff, J., & Cohen, D. (2006). Do antidepressants cure or create abnormal brain states? PLoS Medicine, 3(7), e240. https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.0030240
Rogowsky, B. A., Calhoun, B. M., & Tallal, P. (2015). Matching learning style to instructional method: Effects on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 64–78. https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/features/edu-a0037478.pdf
Pashler H, McDaniel M, Rohrer D, Bjork R. Learning Styles: Concepts and Evidence. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2008 Dec;9(3):105-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x. Epub 2008 Dec 1. PMID: 26162104.
Volkow ND, Koob G. Brain disease model of addiction: why is it so controversial? Lancet Psychiatry. 2015 Aug;2(8):677-679. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00236-9. PMID: 26249284; PMCID: PMC4556943.
McLellan AT, Lewis DC, O'Brien CP, Kleber HD. Drug Dependence, a Chronic Medical Illness: Implications for Treatment, Insurance, and Outcomes Evaluation. JAMA. 2000;284(13):1689–1695. doi:10.1001/jama.284.13.1689


